Claim · model-written summary
The deep percolation deviation between 40 cm and 60 cm interfaces was 0.9% of irrigation amount.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Outcome
- deep percolation deviation ratee0
- Value
- 0.9%e0
- Comparator
- 40 cm and60cm interfacese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The deep percolation deviation rate between 40 cm and60cm interfaces accounted for 0.9%of irrigation amount”
t0“Tomato”
Title
Zhao Wei-xi Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 2014
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Irrigation frequency had no significant influence on deep percolation or total water consumption.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer had no significant influence on deep percolation or total water consumption.
- Observation Deep percolation accounted for 13.8% of irrigation amount.
- Observation Total tomato water consumption was 210.2mm.
- Observation Daily mean tomato water consumption rate was 2.3mm/d.
- Method / resource The corresponding tomato total water consumption deviation was 2%.
- Method / resource Trime tube and Hydra Probe estimates of total tomato water consumption differed by 0.9%, with larger stage differences.
- Recommendation The authors recommended continuous use of one soil water sensor type across crop growth stages.
- Recommendation The authors recommended measuring deep percolation at the depth containing 80% of roots.