fertilization · Physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
46 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
3 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 33
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Reduced Nitrogen Fertigation Rates on Growth and Yield of Tomato · 2007
- positive
- positive
The influence of drip fertigation on water use efficiency in tomato crop production. · 2011
- positive
- positive
Effects of Water/Fertilizer Treatments on Soil Ecology Environment and Tomato Growth in Greenhouse · 2012
- positive
Effect of drip fertigation on water and nitrogen use efficiency and nitrate residues in a greenhouse · 2015
- positive
- positive
- positive
Reducing Nutrient and Irrigation Rates in Solar Greenhouse without Compromising Tomato Yield · 2019
- positive
- positive
Effect of compost tea and partial root zone drying on tomato productivity and quality · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Physiological Studies on Improving Salinity Tolerance in Tomato Plants · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 8
- negative
TOMATO (lycopersicon esculenlum MILL.) RESPONSE TO BIOSOLID YARD-WASTE COMPOST · 2000
- no effect
- no effect
Effect of night salinity level on water use, physiological responses, yield and quality of tomato · 2004
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
fertilization on Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) against other targets
fertilization · physiology: water on other organisms
- Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Zea mays (maize)
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Glycine max (soybean)
- Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
- Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
- Hordeum vulgare (barley)
- Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)
- Cucumis sativus (cucumber)
- Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
- Malus domestica (apple)