Abstract
The experiment under the condition of the greenhouse,studied the effect of fertigation,straw counters-field and soil conditioner on the structure of microbial population,chemical property,tomato growth and yields.The results showed that:(1)The microorganism and the total number of bacterium under fertigation were lower than in furrow irrigation under membrane,but the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F) was higher.In conditioners of fertigation,application of straw increased the total number of fungus and actinomycetes,but it reduced the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F),the soil conditioner increased the actinomycetes and the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F),but it reduced the total number of fungus;(2) Soil acidification was mitigated by Fertigation,the straw or soil conditioners.Fertigation also decreased the salt accumulation in the surface soil and reduced the NO3——N residual in the soil profile;(3) The too fast growth of tomatoes would be inhibit by fertigation at earlier stage,but the promotion of growth was quite obvious at later stage.Compared with FP+M,tomato's yield of FG+M was increased by 21.90%.In fertigation water productivity,N partial factor production and economic benefit was higher than in furrow irrigation under membrane treatment.But using the half of organic fertilizer,had no effect on the economic benefit,and obviously improved N partial factor production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation lowered soil microorganism and bacterium totals versus furrow irrigation under membrane.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- fertigatione0
- Outcome
- microorganism and the total number of bacteriume0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigation under membranee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“The microorganism and the total number of bacterium under fertigation were lower than in furrow irrigation under membrane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation raised the bacteria to fungi ratio.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fertigatione1
- Outcome
- bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F) was higher”
e1“The microorganism and the total number of bacterium under fertigation were lower than in furrow irrigation under membrane”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw increased fungus and actinomycete counts.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- strawe0
- Outcome
- total number of fungus and actinomycetese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“application of straw increased the total number of fungus and actinomycetes”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw reduced the bacteria to fungi ratio.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- strawe1
- Outcome
- bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F)e0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“it reduced the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F)”
e1“application of straw increased the total number of fungus and actinomycetes”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil conditioner increased actinomycetes and the bacteria to fungi ratio.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- soil conditionere0
- Outcome
- actinomycetes and the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“the soil conditioner increased the actinomycetes and the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil conditioner reduced the total fungus count.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- soil conditionere1
- Outcome
- total number of funguse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“it reduced the total number of fungus”
e1“the soil conditioner increased the actinomycetes and the bacteria and fungi ratios(B/F)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation mitigated soil acidification.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Fertigatione0
- Outcome
- Soil acidificatione0
- Direction
- mitigatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“Soil acidification was mitigated by Fertigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw mitigated soil acidification.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- strawe0
- Outcome
- Soil acidificatione0
- Direction
- mitigatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“Soil acidification was mitigated by Fertigation,the straw”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil conditioner mitigated soil acidification.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- soil conditionerse0
- Outcome
- Soil acidificatione0
- Direction
- mitigatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“Soil acidification was mitigated by Fertigation,the straw or soil conditioners”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation decreased surface soil salt accumulation and residual soil nitrate nitrogen.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Fertigatione0
- Outcome
- salt accumulation in the surface soil and reduced the NO3——N residual in the soil profilee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“Fertigation also decreased the salt accumulation in the surface soil and reduced the NO3——N residual in the soil profile”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation inhibited overly rapid early tomato growth.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fertigatione0
- Outcome
- growth of tomatoese0
- Direction
- inhibite0
- Qualifier
- at earlier stagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“The too fast growth of tomatoes would be inhibit by fertigation at earlier stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation promoted later tomato growth.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fertigatione1
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- promotione0
- Qualifier
- at later stagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“the promotion of growth was quite obvious at later stage”
e1“The microorganism and the total number of bacterium under fertigation were lower than in furrow irrigation under membrane”
Claim · model-written summary
FG+M increased tomato yield 21.90% versus FP+M.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- FG+Me0
- Outcome
- tomato's yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 21.90%e0
- Comparator
- FP+Me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“Compared with FP+M,tomato's yield of FG+M was increased by 21.90%”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation raised water productivity, nitrogen partial factor production and economic benefit versus membrane furrow irrigation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fertigatione0
- Outcome
- water productivity,N partial factor production and economic benefite0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigation under membrane treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“In fertigation water productivity,N partial factor production and economic benefit was higher than in furrow irrigation under membrane treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Halving organic fertilizer did not change economic benefit.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- half of organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- economic benefite0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“using the half of organic fertilizer,had no effect on the economic benefit”
Claim · model-written summary
Halving organic fertilizer improved nitrogen partial factor production.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- half of organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- N partial factor productione0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“using the half of organic fertilizer,had no effect on the economic benefit,and obviously improved N partial factor production”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.