Paper · 2021

Drip irrigation affects N2O emission differently depending on soil moisture status in an intensive vegetable production system

Xiuchun Xu; Di Wu; Wei Zhang; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plastic-shed vegetable production system is becoming the main type of vegetable production in China, while excessive irrigation and fertilization input lead to significant N loss by leaching, runoff, and gaseous N. The current study established a field experiment to investigate the effects of drip irrigation and optimized fertilization on vegetable yield, water and fertilizer efficiencies and N2O emission in a typical intensive plastic-shed tomato production region of China. The treatments include CK (no fertilization, flood irrigation), FFP (farmers’ conventional fertilization, flood irrigation), OPT1 (80% of FFP fertilization, flood irrigation), OPT2 (80% of FFP fertilization, drip irrigation). N2O isotopocule deltas, including δ15Nbulk, δ18O and SP (the 15N site preference in N2O), have been used to investigate microbial pathways of N2O production under different treatments. Our results showed: i) optimized fertilization and drip irrigation significantly improved the fertilizer and water use efficiency without reducing tomato yield, ii) compared with flood irrigation, drip irrigation decreased soil WFPS and soil ammonium content, but increased soil nitrate content. When soil moisture was higher than 60%WFPS, drip irrigation led to a decrease of N2O emission with lower N2O SP signature observed than that of food irrigation, suggesting a reduction of denitrification derived N2O. In contrast, drip irrigation significantly increased N2O emission and N2O SP value when soil moisture status was lower than 55% WFPS, which may be due to the enhanced nitrification or fungal denitrification derived N2O.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization and drip irrigation improved fertilizer use efficiency.

Treatment
optimized fertilization and drip irrigatione0
Outcome
fertilizer and water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimized fertilization and drip irrigation significantly improved the fertilizer and water use efficiency without reducing tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization and drip irrigation improved water use efficiency.

Treatment
optimized fertilization and drip irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimized fertilization and drip irrigation significantly improved the fertilizer and water use efficiency without reducing tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization and drip irrigation did not reduce tomato yield.

Treatment
optimized fertilization and drip irrigatione0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
without reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimized fertilization and drip irrigation significantly improved the fertilizer and water use efficiency without reducing tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation decreased soil WFPS relative to flood irrigation.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
soil WFPSe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
flood irrigatione0

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with flood irrigation, drip irrigation decreased soil WFPS and soil ammonium content, but increased soil nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation decreased soil ammonium content relative to flood irrigation.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
soil ammonium contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
flood irrigatione0

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with flood irrigation, drip irrigation decreased soil WFPS and soil ammonium content, but increased soil nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased soil nitrate content relative to flood irrigation.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
soil nitrate contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flood irrigatione0

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with flood irrigation, drip irrigation decreased soil WFPS and soil ammonium content, but increased soil nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 60% WFPS, drip irrigation decreased N2O emission.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
N2O emissione0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
soil moisture was higher than 60%WFPSe0
Comparator
food irrigatione0

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“When soil moisture was higher than 60%WFPS, drip irrigation led to a decrease of N2O emission with lower N2O SP signature observed than that of food irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 60% WFPS, drip irrigation lowered the N2O SP signature relative to flood irrigation.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
N2O SP signaturee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
soil moisture was higher than 60%WFPSe0
Comparator
food irrigatione0

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“When soil moisture was higher than 60%WFPS, drip irrigation led to a decrease of N2O emission with lower N2O SP signature observed than that of food irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 55% WFPS, drip irrigation increased N2O emission.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
N2O emissione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
soil moisture status was lower than 55% WFPSe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“drip irrigation significantly increased N2O emission and N2O SP value when soil moisture status was lower than 55% WFPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 55% WFPS, drip irrigation increased the N2O SP value.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
N2O SP valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
soil moisture status was lower than 55% WFPSe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“drip irrigation significantly increased N2O emission and N2O SP value when soil moisture status was lower than 55% WFPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1697 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 117 positive, 30 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 850 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.