Abstract
To study the effect of different levels of irrigation and nutrient management practices on yield and water use efficiency of tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari) a field experiment, with three irrigation schedules and four nutrient management practices, was conducted in the Regional Research Technology and Transfer Station (RRTTS),Chiplima, Sambalpur for three years. Three years pooled mean of tomato fruit yield indicated that highest fruit yield of 18.48 t ha-1 was observed with IW:CPE of 1.2 irrespective of different nutrient management practices. Highest pooled mean fruit yield of 19.07 t ha-1 was recorded with application of 25% organic+75% inorganic which was significantly superior to 50% organic+50% inorganic (18.26 t ha-1), 100% organic (16.01 t ha-1) and 100% inorganic (17.21 t ha-1) irrespective of different irrigation levels. Highest mean water use efficiencies of 533.45 kg ha-1 cm-1 and 469.47 kg ha-1 cm-1 were observed with IW:CPE of 0.8 and application of 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizer respectively. Among the irrigation treatments highest net return (` 56,136/-) and benefit-cost ratio (2.03) were observed with 1.2 IW:CPE, whereas the highest net return (` 61,560/-) and benefit-cost ratio (2.16) were observed with 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilzer . Thus, integrated use of 25% organic along with 75% inorganic fertilizer as per recommended dose of nutrient with an irrigation scheduling at 1.2 IW:CPE produced highest fruit yield of tomato as compared to other treatments. The fruit yield per hectare was significantly correlated to all other yield attributing parameters except days to first harvest.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
IW:CPE of 1.2 gave highest fruit yield of 18.48 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Material
- cv. Utkal Kumarie1
- Treatment
- IW:CPE of 1.2e0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 18.48 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest fruit yield of 18.48 t ha-1 was observed with IW:CPE of 1.2”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
25% organic+75% inorganic gave highest pooled mean fruit yield of 19.07 t ha-1, significantly above the other fertilizer practices.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- 25% organic+75% inorganice0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 19.07 t ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 100% organic (16.01 t ha-1) and 100% inorganic (17.21 t ha-1)e0
- Comparator
- 50% organic+50% inorganice0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest pooled mean fruit yield of 19.07 t ha-1 was recorded with application of 25% organic+75% inorganic which was significantly superior to 50% organic+50% inorganic (18.26 t ha-1), 100% organic (16.01 t ha-1) and 100% inorganic (17.21 t ha-1)”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
IW:CPE of 0.8 gave highest water use efficiency of 533.45 kg ha-1 cm-1.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- IW:CPE of 0.8e0
- Outcome
- water use efficienciese0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 533.45 kg ha-1 cm-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest mean water use efficiencies of 533.45 kg ha-1 cm-1 and 469.47 kg ha-1 cm-1 were observed with IW:CPE of 0.8 and application of 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizer respectively”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizer gave water use efficiency of 469.47 kg ha-1 cm-1.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- water use efficienciese0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 469.47 kg ha-1 cm-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest mean water use efficiencies of 533.45 kg ha-1 cm-1 and 469.47 kg ha-1 cm-1 were observed with IW:CPE of 0.8 and application of 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizer respectively”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
1.2 IW:CPE had highest net return of 56,136/-.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- 1.2 IW:CPEe0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 56,136/-e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest net return (` 56,136/-) and benefit-cost ratio (2.03) were observed with 1.2 IW:CPE”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
1.2 IW:CPE had highest benefit-cost ratio of 2.03.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- 1.2 IW:CPEe0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.03e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest net return (` 56,136/-) and benefit-cost ratio (2.03) were observed with 1.2 IW:CPE”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizer had highest net return of 61,560/-.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilzere0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 61,560/-e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest net return (` 61,560/-) and benefit-cost ratio (2.16) were observed with 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilzer”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
25% organic+75% inorganic fertilizer had highest benefit-cost ratio of 2.16.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilzere0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.16e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest net return (` 61,560/-) and benefit-cost ratio (2.16) were observed with 25% organic+75% inorganic fertilzer”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined 25% organic and 75% inorganic fertilizer at 1.2 IW:CPE produced highest tomato fruit yield.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- 25% organic along with 75% inorganic fertilizer as per recommended dose of nutrient with an irrigation scheduling at 1.2 IW:CPEe0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“integrated use of 25% organic along with 75% inorganic fertilizer as per recommended dose of nutrient with an irrigation scheduling at 1.2 IW:CPE produced highest fruit yield of tomato as compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield was significantly correlated with all yield attributes except days to first harvest.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Organ / stage
- days to first harveste0
- Outcome
- fruit yield per hectaree0
- Qualifier
- except days to first harveste0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit yield per hectare was significantly correlated to all other yield attributing parameters except days to first harvest.”
e1“tomato (cv. Utkal Kumari)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
340 papers more in this group
See all 344 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.