Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged W1P2 the better water and fertilizer combination.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- W1P2 was the better combination of water and fertilizere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment W1P2 was the better combination of water and fertilizer”
t0“wheat”
Title
Lingyan Li Turang feiliao 2010
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Under W1, P2 had smaller post-anthesis decreases in protective enzyme activities and increase in MDA than the other phosphorus treatments.
- Association Protective enzyme activities increased as phosphorus increased.
- Association MDA content decreased as phosphorus increased.
- Intervention effect Moderate phosphorus under W1 or increasing phosphorus under W2 improved protective enzyme activity.
- Intervention effect These phosphorus regimes could increase leaf area index, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rate.
- Intervention effect These phosphorus regimes could delay flag leaf senescence.
- Intervention effect These phosphorus regimes could increase wheat yield.
- Intervention effect W2P2 gave the highest yield, without a significant difference from W1P2.