Paper · 2010 · Turang feiliao

Effects of different soil water conditions and different phosphorus supplied on the flag leaf senescence and yield of wheat

Lingyan Li

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to clarify the rational regulation of different water conditions and phosphorus supplied,a rain-proof pool culture experiment,including two water levels,i.e.,moderate soil water content(75%),water stress(55%),and three fertilizing levels,i.e.,P1(75 kg/hm2),P2(150 kg/hm2),P3(225 kg/hm2)was conducted.The results showed that the decreasing range of SOD、POD、CAT and arising range of MDA in P2 treament under W1 were lower than the other two after anthesis.The activities of SOD、POD、CAT increased and the content of MDA decreased with the increase of phosphorus.Therefore moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2 could improve protective enzyme,increase leaf area index、chlorophyll content,and photosynthetic rate,delay the senescence,incease the yield.Though W2P2 achieved the highest yield,compared with W1P2,it had no siganificant difference.It was concluded that the treatment W1P2 was the better combination of water and fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under W1, P2 had smaller post-anthesis decreases in protective enzyme activities and increase in MDA than the other phosphorus treatments.

Organ / stage
after anthesise0
Treatment
P2 treament under W1e0
Outcome
decreasing range of SOD、POD、CAT and arising range of MDAe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the other twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decreasing range of SOD、POD、CAT and arising range of MDA in P2 treament under W1 were lower than the other two after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective enzyme activities increased as phosphorus increased.

Treatment
increase of phosphoruse0
Outcome
activities of SOD、POD、CATe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of SOD、POD、CAT increased and the content of MDA decreased with the increase of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA content decreased as phosphorus increased.

Treatment
increase of phosphoruse0
Outcome
content of MDAe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of SOD、POD、CAT increased and the content of MDA decreased with the increase of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate phosphorus under W1 or increasing phosphorus under W2 improved protective enzyme activity.

Treatment
moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2e0
Outcome
protective enzymee0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2 could improve protective enzyme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These phosphorus regimes could increase leaf area index, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2e0
Outcome
leaf area index、chlorophyll content,and photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2 could improve protective enzyme,increase leaf area index、chlorophyll content,and photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These phosphorus regimes could delay flag leaf senescence.

Treatment
moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2e0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2 could improve protective enzyme,increase leaf area index、chlorophyll content,and photosynthetic rate,delay the senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These phosphorus regimes could increase wheat yield.

Treatment
moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
inceasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate phosphorus supplied under W1 and increasing phosphorus supplied under W2 could improve protective enzyme,increase leaf area index、chlorophyll content,and photosynthetic rate,delay the senescence,incease the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2P2 gave the highest yield, without a significant difference from W1P2.

Treatment
W2P2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
W1P2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2P2 achieved the highest yield,compared with W1P2,it had no siganificant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged W1P2 the better water and fertilizer combination.

Outcome
W1P2 was the better combination of water and fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment W1P2 was the better combination of water and fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

phosphorus · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.