Paper · 1987 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Senescence of the flag leaf and grain yield following late foliar and root applications of phosphate on plants of differing phosphorus status

G.D. Batten; I.F. Wardlaw

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The balance between leaf senescence, induced by phosphorus deficiency, and grain growth was examined in wheat plants grown in sand with high (control) and low phosphorus (low‐P) nutrition. Foliar applications of P were made prior to anthesis and at early and mid grain development. Low‐P plants were also given an additional dose of P via the roots at mid grain development. Foliar applications of P had no effect on leaf function (net CO2 exchange rate), or grain development in control plants. However, P applied to the flag leaf of low‐P plants delayed senescence and thus increased leaf area duration, but this did not result in a significant increase in grain yield per ear. Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes) of low‐P plants increased the concentration of P in the grain, but did not increase the number of cells per grain, or the grain yield per ear. The late application of P via the roots also delayed senescence in low‐P plants, but did not cause an increase in yield. These experiments indicate that grain growth in low‐P plants is not limited by the level of supply of photosynthate, or the availability of P during the actual period of grain development. Phosphorus translocated to the grain late in plant development is used inefficiently in plants that are adequately supplied with phosphorus and in plants suffering from P deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P did not affect leaf function (net CO2 exchange rate) in control wheat plants.

Treatment
Foliar applications of Pe0
Outcome
leaf function (net CO2 exchange rate)e0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar applications of P had no effect on leaf function (net CO2 exchange rate), or grain development in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P did not affect grain development in control wheat plants.

Treatment
Foliar applications of Pe0
Outcome
grain developmente0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar applications of P had no effect on leaf function (net CO2 exchange rate), or grain development in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf P in low-P wheat delayed senescence.

Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
P applied to the flag leafe0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“P applied to the flag leaf of low‐P plants delayed senescence and thus increased leaf area duration, but this did not result in a significant increase in grain yield per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf P in low-P wheat increased leaf area duration.

Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
P applied to the flag leafe0
Outcome
leaf area duratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“P applied to the flag leaf of low‐P plants delayed senescence and thus increased leaf area duration, but this did not result in a significant increase in grain yield per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf P in low-P wheat did not result in a significant increase grain yield per ear.

Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
P applied to the flag leafe0
Outcome
grain yield per eare0
Direction
did not result in a significant increasee0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“P applied to the flag leaf of low‐P plants delayed senescence and thus increased leaf area duration, but this did not result in a significant increase in grain yield per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear-surface phosphorus in low-P wheat increased concentration of P in the grain.

Organ / stage
ear surface (the glumes)e0
Treatment
Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes)e0
Outcome
concentration of P in the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes) of low‐P plants increased the concentration of P in the grain, but did not increase the number of cells per grain, or the grain yield per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear-surface phosphorus in low-P wheat did not increase number of cells per grain.

Organ / stage
ear surface (the glumes)e0
Treatment
Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes)e0
Outcome
number of cells per graine0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes) of low‐P plants increased the concentration of P in the grain, but did not increase the number of cells per grain, or the grain yield per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear-surface phosphorus in low-P wheat did not increase grain yield per ear.

Organ / stage
ear surface (the glumes)e0
Treatment
Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes)e0
Outcome
grain yield per eare0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus applied to the ear surface (the glumes) of low‐P plants increased the concentration of P in the grain, but did not increase the number of cells per grain, or the grain yield per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late root P in low-P wheat delayed senescence.

Treatment
late application of P via the rootse0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“The late application of P via the roots also delayed senescence in low‐P plants, but did not cause an increase in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late root P in low-P wheat did not cause an increase yield.

Treatment
late application of P via the rootse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not cause an increasee0
Comparator
low‐P plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“The late application of P via the roots also delayed senescence in low‐P plants, but did not cause an increase in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1003 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer low-P wheat grain growth is limited by neither photosynthate supply nor P availability during grain development.

Outcome
grain growthe0
Qualifier
not limited by the level of supply of photosynthate, or the availability of P during the actual period of grain developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain growth in low‐P plants is not limited by the level of supply of photosynthate, or the availability of P during the actual period of grain development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1191 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-translocated phosphorus is used inefficiently in both P-adequate and P-deficient wheat.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
Phosphorus translocated to the grain late in plant development is used inefficientlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus translocated to the grain late in plant development is used inefficiently in plants that are adequately supplied with phosphorus and in plants suffering from P deficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1375 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 35 positive, 18 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 273 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 524 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.