Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Meski stomatal density increased 7% during drought.

A claim from Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meski stomatal density increased 7% during drought.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Meski’e0
Treatment
drought treatmente0
Outcome
stomatal density (SD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
‘Chemlali’e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal density (SD) in ‘Chemlali’ leaves increased by 25%(vs. 7% for ‘Meski’ leaves) during drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1124
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108

Title

Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar

M. Ennajeh; A.M. Vadel; H. Cochard; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2010. doi:10.1080/14620316.2010.11512670

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-37c8dde42b13d3e01d81c0e3f09fa0a3073bbd563e885e47d92cbe8b2eeb5baa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.