Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined priming increased nitrate reductase activity of leaves, with increments of 12.81, 5.61 and 7.75%.

A claim from Seed Priming with Mg(NO3)2 and ZnSO4 Salts Triggers the Germination and Growth Attributes Synergistically in Wheat Varieties · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined priming increased nitrate reductase activity of leaves, with increments of 12.81, 5.61 and 7.75%.

Treatment
combined priming treatmente4
Outcome
nitrate reductase activity of leavese4
Direction
increasede4
Value
12.81, 5.61, 7.75%e4
Qualifier
after 35, 45, and 60 days after sowinge4
Comparator
nonprimed control seeds (T1)e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124
e3

“All treatments were compared with the performance of nonprimed control seeds (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–604
e4

“protein content and nitrate reductase activity of leaves showed the highest increment in combined priming treatment and increased 63.77, 90.37, 37.44% and 12.81, 5.61, 7.75%, respectively, after 35, 45, and 60 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1517

Title

Seed Priming with Mg(NO3)2 and ZnSO4 Salts Triggers the Germination and Growth Attributes Synergistically in Wheat Varieties

Surendra Kumar Choudhary; Vivek Kumar; Rajesh Kumar Singhal; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11112110

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-37e12971caa8faa2900c5a34564526d1461da0c851698535af0e0d97a0a7234a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.