Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T4 (100% RDN + Sprayers of 5% Panchagavya) showed superior TSS content (4.91) compared with others.

A claim from Effect of panchagavya on growth, yield and quality of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 (100% RDN + Sprayers of 5% Panchagavya) showed superior TSS content (4.91) compared with others.

Treatment
100% RDN + Sprayers of 5% Panchagavyae0
Outcome
TSS contente1
Direction
superiore2
Value
4.91e1
Comparator
otherse3
Setting
Prayagraj (UP)e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings indicated that T4 (100% RDN + Sprayers of 5% Panchagavya)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–490
e1

“TSS content (4.91)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–821
e2

“exhibited superior performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–521
e3

“compared to others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–974
e4

“Prayagraj (UP) from February 2023 to June 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–233
e5

“quality of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–292

Title

Effect of panchagavya on growth, yield and quality of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

Sachin Nagar; Samir Ebson Topno; Annjoe V Joseph International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i5c.674

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-396c9ff57a94b8d2a6c0bfcc4cc110bd9407346b0bacc21b1247e4befa4b3206 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

application · quality: sugar starch · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.