Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under FON+3 irrigation, South Gavhari yield was 42.8 t/ha, higher than under the other irrigation options.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Regime on Biometric Indicators of Spring Wheat Varieties · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under FON+3 irrigation, South Gavhari yield was 42.8 t/ha, higher than under the other irrigation options.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Southern Geme6
Treatment
FON+3 irrigation optione4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
42.8 t/hae6
Comparator
other optionse4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–77
e4

“The yield was higher in the FON+3 irrigation option compared to other options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–862
e6

“42.8 t/ha in the Southern Gem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–947

Title

Effect of Irrigation Regime on Biometric Indicators of Spring Wheat Varieties

Bisenbay Bekbanov; Orakbay Nagimetov; Bibinaz Kosbergenova BIO Web of Conferences 2023. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20237803010

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-3a587650465b531253ee4ea718fa905408bc9bdbeffb0bbd80f203ffd4d0abec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.