Claim · model-written summary
Intermediate and codominant pole-sized maples tended to respond to nitrogen plus phosphorus fertilization, without a statistically significant difference.
- Taxon
- maplese0
- Treatment
- N + Pe0
- Outcome
- respond to fertilizatione0
- Direction
- tended to responde0
- Qualifier
- intermediate and codominant crown positionse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“Pole-sized maples in intermediate and codominant crown positions tended to respond to fertilization with N and N + P but the differences were not statistically significant”
Title
Fertilization of a pole-sized maple stand: 10-year results
Douglas M. Stone Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1980. doi:10.1139/x80-028
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Association Initial diameter and stand density greatly influenced maple diameter and basal area growth.
- Association Initial plot basal area accounted for 65% of variation in maple diameter growth.
- Association Initial plot basal area accounted for 49% of variation in maple basal area growth.
- Intervention effect Fertilization decreased diameter growth of suppressed maples.
- Intervention effect Fertilization increased mortality of suppressed maples.
- Intervention effect Intermediate and codominant pole-sized maples tended to respond to nitrogen fertilization, without a statistically significant difference.
- Observation Dominant maples grew more than intermediate or codominant maples.