Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three irrigations gave the highest tiller count, statistically at par with four.

A claim from Productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in relation to hydrogel as influenced by different irrigation regimes and nutrient levels · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations gave the highest tiller count, statistically at par with four.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three irrigationse1
Outcome
tiller counte1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
four irrigationse1
Setting
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhianae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–44
e0

“Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–292
e1

“The highest tiller count was recorded under three irrigations which was statistically at par with four irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1092

Title

Productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in relation to hydrogel as influenced by different irrigation regimes and nutrient levels

Shahid B. Dar; Hari Ram International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3aea2c8a5db0865d6ef5b1931f1a7a10247dd4d35731abefc5b578d0fa1b1edd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.