Claim · model-written summary
The average B:C ratio under conservation agriculture was 42% higher than under conventional agriculture.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of conservation agriculture on grain yield and income of maize”
e0“The average B:C ratio of CAwas 42% higher (2.01) than ConvA(1.41)”
Title
H.K. Prasai; S.K. Sah; A.K. Gautam; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2018. doi:10.15547/ast.2018.04.060
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Maize productivity under the M-L-MB cropping system was 1.6% higher than under M-W-MB.
- Intervention effect Maize grain yield under conservation agriculture was 16.7% higher than under conventional agriculture.
- Intervention effect The Rajkumar variety gave 43% higher average maize grain yield than Arun-2.
- Intervention effect The average net benefit under the M-L-MB cropping system was slightly higher than under M-W-MB.
- Intervention effect The average net benefit under conservation agriculture was 102% higher than under conventional agriculture.
- Intervention effect The Rajkumar variety gave 127% higher average net benefit than Arun-2.
- Intervention effect The Rajkumar variety gave a 33% higher average B:C ratio than Arun-2.
- Recommendation Hybrid maize planting and the M-L-MB cropping system should be used to increase grain yield and economic performance under conservation agriculture.