Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hybrid #2 had greater growth under waterlogging

A claim from Screening Corn Hybrids for Soil Waterlogging Tolerance at an Early Growth Stage · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid #2 had greater growth under waterlogging

Material
Hybrid #2e1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screening Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22
e1

“Hybrid #2 appeared to be more tolerant to waterlogging as evidenced by greater growth and higher stomatal conductance and chlorophyll meter readings on newer leaves under waterlogged conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–960

Title

Screening Corn Hybrids for Soil Waterlogging Tolerance at an Early Growth Stage

Gurpreet Kaur; Brendan Zurweller; Peter Motavalli; et al. Agriculture 2019. doi:10.3390/agriculture9020033

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-3b855445d9bfe0a120883a6dc7c51f6c4a6b23edc654dd019be1f45ab243301d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

68 papers: 12 positive, 56 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Waterlogging reduced root length, density and tip number.

    Root and Shoot Responses of Summer Maize to Waterlogging at Different Stages · 2016 · compared with control (CK)

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Flooding reduced shoot biomass in both varieties by 20 to 50%.

    EARLY FLOODING OF TWO CULTIVARS OF TROPICAL MAIZE. I. SHOOT AND ROOT GROWTH · 2001

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Forty-eight hours of flooding reduced emergence in inbred and hybrid corn.

    Emergence of Inbred and Hybrid Corn Following Flooding1 · 1985

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  4. negative
    Average belowground biomass was 52% higher in non-flooded than in flooded maize seedlings.

    Effects of soil flooding on photosynthesis and growth of Zea mays L. seedlings under different light intensities · 2012 · compared with non-flooded

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  5. negative
    Waterlogging reduced corn biomass by 66 % during the vegetative stage.

    Quantifying resilience of major field crops to waterlogging during vegetative and reproductive stages · 2026 · compared with control (non-waterlogged)

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  6. positive
    Adventitious root number increased most at V11.

    Effects of Waterlogging at Different Developmental Stages on Growth, Yield and Physiological Responses of Forage Maize · 2025

    Same directionCites this paper

  7. negative
    Waterlogging reduced leaf area index, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate and photochemical efficiency.

    Effects of Waterlogging on Leaf Mesophyll Cell Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Summer Maize · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    waterlogging reduced maize root-shoot length.

    Morpho-Physio-Biochemical and Molecular Responses of Maize Hybrids to Salinity and Waterlogging during Stress and Recovery Phase · 2021

    Opposite direction

59 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.