Claim · model-written summary
Fuel intake per tonne of yield was 12,0 l/t under no tillage, lower than 14,7 l/t under the classic system.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The energy intake for the initiation and maintenanc e of maize crop, according to the classic technology, represents 22,957 Mj/ha”
e1“The fuel intake analyzed in comparison with the yie ld achieved has the following values: 14,7 l/t under the classic system, 13,2-13, 8 l/t in the variants with minimal tillage system and 12,0 l/t in the no tillage variant”
Title
TILLAGE SYSTEM’S INFLUENCE UPON ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE YIELD
D. Popa Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture 1970. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:1404
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect No-tillage reduced the energetic input of maize by 15.52% compared with the plough with a mould board.
- Intervention effect Fuel intake under the mo tillage variant was 80,70 l/ha, lower than 111,10 l/ha under the classic system.
- Observation The energy intake for maize under the classic technology was 22,957 Mj/ha.
- Intervention effect Energetic efficiency of the V4 tillage variant (8.15) was bigger than that of the control variant (8.12).
- Intervention effect Energetic efficiency of the V5 tillage variant (8.46) was bigger than that of the control variant (8.12).
- Intervention effect Energetic efficiency of the V6 no-tillage variant (8.79) was bigger than that of the control variant (8.12).
- Intervention effect No-tillage maize achieved yields similar to those under the classic system.
- Intervention effect No-tillage maize had smaller technological costs than the classic system.