Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects of conventional and conservation tillage on the some soil physical properties, penetration resistance (PR), seedling emergence rate, yield and yield components under southestern of Turkey conditions. The experiments were carried out at 2003 and 2004 years in a clay loam soil. Six different soil tillage methods in corn production were tested. The experiment was performed in randomized block design with six treatments and each treatment consists of three replications. No significant (p>0.05) treatment differences in seedling emergence were found between the tillage treatments for both years. Plant height was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. However, the highest plant height was obtained in 2004 under CT tillage method. The stalk thickness was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. The cob length was not found significant between years and treatments. The lowest cob length was obtained under NT method. It was found that yield was significantly (p<0.01) different between years. The yield in the second year was found to be higher than that of the first year. The highest yield was found in CT method as 678.00 kg/da and the lowest yield was found in RT4 method as 535.66 kg/ha in year 2003. The highest yield was found in CT method as 778.66 kg/da and the lowest yield was found in RT4 method as 642.33 kg/ha in year 2004. The highest fuel comsumption was obsorved as 33.48 Lha-1 in conventional method (CT) whereas the lowest value was found in direct seeding method as 6.6 Lha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage treatments did not significantly change seedling emergence of corn in either year.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- tillage treatmentse0
- Outcome
- seedling emergencee0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
- Qualifier
- p>0.05e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e0“No significant (p>0.05) treatment differences in seedling emergence were found between the tillage treatments for both years”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height differed significantly between years, while tillage treatment effects were not significant.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- Plant heighte1
- Comparator
- between yearse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e1“Plant height was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. However, the highest plant height was obtained in 2004 under CT tillage method”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height was highest in 2004 under the CT tillage method.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- CT tillage methode1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- 2004e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e1“Plant height was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. However, the highest plant height was obtained in 2004 under CT tillage method”
Claim · model-written summary
Stalk thickness differed significantly between years, while tillage treatment effects were not significant.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- stalk thicknesse2
- Comparator
- between yearse2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e2“The stalk thickness was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. The cob length was not found significant between years and treatments. The lowest cob length was obtained under NT method”
Claim · model-written summary
Cob length did not differ significantly between years or tillage treatments.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- cob lengthe2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Comparator
- between years and treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e2“The stalk thickness was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. The cob length was not found significant between years and treatments. The lowest cob length was obtained under NT method”
Claim · model-written summary
The NT method gave the lowest cob length.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- NT methode2
- Outcome
- cob lengthe2
- Direction
- loweste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e2“The stalk thickness was found significant between years while treatment effects were not significant. The cob length was not found significant between years and treatments. The lowest cob length was obtained under NT method”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield differed significantly between years (p<0.01).
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Qualifier
- p<0.01e3
- Comparator
- between yearse3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e3“It was found that yield was significantly (p<0.01) different between years. The yield in the second year was found to be higher than that of the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield in the second year was higher than in the first year.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- that of the first yeare3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e3“It was found that yield was significantly (p<0.01) different between years. The yield in the second year was found to be higher than that of the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
The CT method gave the highest yield, 678.00 kg/da, in 2003.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- CT methode4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 678.00 kg/dae4
- Setting
- year 2003e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e4“The highest yield was found in CT method as 678.00 kg/da and the lowest yield was found in RT4 method as 535.66 kg/ha in year 2003”
Claim · model-written summary
The RT4 method gave the lowest yield, 535.66 kg/ha, in 2003.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- RT4 methode4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- loweste4
- Value
- 535.66 kg/hae4
- Setting
- year 2003e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e4“The highest yield was found in CT method as 678.00 kg/da and the lowest yield was found in RT4 method as 535.66 kg/ha in year 2003”
Claim · model-written summary
The CT method gave the highest yield, 778.66 kg/da, in 2004.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- CT methode5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 778.66 kg/dae5
- Setting
- year 2004e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e5“The highest yield was found in CT method as 778.66 kg/da and the lowest yield was found in RT4 method as 642.33 kg/ha in year 2004”
Claim · model-written summary
The RT4 method gave the lowest yield, 642.33 kg/ha, in 2004.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- RT4 methode5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- loweste5
- Value
- 642.33 kg/hae5
- Setting
- year 2004e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e5“The highest yield was found in CT method as 778.66 kg/da and the lowest yield was found in RT4 method as 642.33 kg/ha in year 2004”
Claim · model-written summary
The conventional (CT) method had the highest fuel consumption, 33.48 L/ha.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- conventional method (CT)e6
- Outcome
- fuel comsumptione6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Value
- 33.48 Lha-1e6
- Comparator
- direct seeding methode6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e6“The highest fuel comsumption was obsorved as 33.48 Lha-1 in conventional method (CT) whereas the lowest value was found in direct seeding method as 6.6 Lha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct seeding had the lowest fuel consumption, 6.6 L/ha.
- Taxon
- CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- direct seeding methode6
- Outcome
- fuel comsumptione6
- Direction
- loweste6
- Value
- 6.6 Lha-1e6
- Comparator
- conventional method (CT)e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
e6“The highest fuel comsumption was obsorved as 33.48 Lha-1 in conventional method (CT) whereas the lowest value was found in direct seeding method as 6.6 Lha-1”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →transplanting · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.