Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Without herbicide, weed biomass in delayed orchardgrass sowing treatments was at least 4.5 times greater by the third harvest.

A claim from Potential for Delayed Orchardgrass Seeding during Glyphosate‐Resistant Alfalfa Establishment · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without herbicide, weed biomass in delayed orchardgrass sowing treatments was at least 4.5 times greater by the third harvest.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
4 and 5 wk after planting treatments not treated with herbicidee0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
at least 4.5 timese0
Comparator
comparable glyphosate treatmentse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed biomass in the 4 and 5 wk after planting treatments not treated with herbicide was at least 4.5 times greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1078
e1

“establishing alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)‐grass mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–106
e2

“comparable glyphosate treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1166

Title

Potential for Delayed Orchardgrass Seeding during Glyphosate‐Resistant Alfalfa Establishment

Bryan L. Dillehay; William S. Curran; Marvin H. Hall Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0132x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3bc59aeac8eb5f02e6213b8f934b40f4afc6d66745a926260030a2cad380f990 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.