Paper · 1972 · Agronomy Journal

Herbicides vs Oat Companion Crops for Alfalfa Establishment1

A. R. Schmid; R. Behrens

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Herbicides are effective for use in establishing alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) without the use of a companion crop. The objective of the study was to assess the economic feasibility of the herbicide method as compared to the companion crop method and to determine some of its advantages and disadvantages. Productivity of ‘Vernal’ alfalfa established with or without a companion crop was determined at four locations in Minnesota. Oats ( Avena sativa L.), harvested for either hay or grain, was used as the companion crop. Four herbicide treatments (EPTC, EPTC + 2,4‐DB, trifluralin, and benefin) were used for weed control when the alfalfa was grown alone. The EPTC soil incorporated treatment plus a postemergence treatment of 2,4‐DB on the alfalfa at the 3 to 4 trifoliolate‐leaf stage was the most effective treatment for controlling weeds. With prices of $27.56/MT for alfalfa hay, $4.20/100 kg for oat grain, and $16.54/MT for oat straw, the net return (excluding costs common to all methods) favored alfalfa establishment with oats harvested for grain and straw. During the establishment year the oat hay companion crop yielded 5.17 metric tons (12% moisture)/ha, while alfalfa grown alone yielded 4.03 metric tons/ha. Oat grains averaged 2,205 kg/ha, and straw yields averaged 5.46 metric tons/ha. Stand counts of alfalfa in the fall of the seeding )year were generally higher for alfalfa grown without a companion crop, but this did not affect the following year's yield. With prices of $27.56/MT for alfalfa hay, $4.20/100 kg for oat grain, and $16.54/MT for oat straw, the net return (excluding costs common to all methods) favored alfalfa establishment with oats harvested for grain and straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EPTC followed by 2,4‐DB was most effective for weed control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
3 to 4 trifoliolate‐leaf stagee0
Treatment
EPTC soil incorporated treatment plus a postemergence treatment of 2,4‐DBe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EPTC soil incorporated treatment plus a postemergence treatment of 2,4‐DB on the alfalfa at the 3 to 4 trifoliolate‐leaf stage was the most effective treatment for controlling weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Establishing alfalfa with oats harvested for grain and straw gave the favored net return at stated prices.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
oats harvested for grain and strawe0
Interactor
oatsAvena sativae0other
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
favorede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · InteractorSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With prices of $27.56/MT for alfalfa hay, $4.20/100 kg for oat grain, and $16.54/MT for oat straw, the net return (excluding costs common to all methods) favored alfalfa establishment with oats harvested for grain and straw. During the establishment year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat hay companion crop yielded 5.17 metric tons per hectare in establishment year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
oatAvena sativae0other
Outcome
oat hay companion crop yieldede0
Value
5.17 metric tons (12% moisture)/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · InteractorSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the establishment year the oat hay companion crop yielded 5.17 metric tons (12% moisture)/ha, while alfalfa grown alone yielded 4.03 metric tons/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa grown alone yielded 4.03 metric tons per hectare in establishment year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
alfalfa grown alone yieldede0
Value
4.03 metric tons/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the establishment year the oat hay companion crop yielded 5.17 metric tons (12% moisture)/ha, while alfalfa grown alone yielded 4.03 metric tons/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat grains averaged 2,205 kg/ha.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
OatAvena sativae0other
Outcome
Oat grainse0
Value
2,205 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · InteractorSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat grains averaged 2,205 kg/ha, and straw yields averaged 5.46 metric tons/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat straw yield averaged 5.46 metric tons/ha.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
OatAvena sativae0other
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Value
5.46 metric tons/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · InteractorSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oat grains averaged 2,205 kg/ha, and straw yields averaged 5.46 metric tons/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa stand counts were generally higher without companion crop in fall of seeding year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
without a companion crope0
Outcome
Stand counts of alfalfae0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stand counts of alfalfa in the fall of the seeding )year were generally higher for alfalfa grown without a companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1436 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stand count difference did not affect following year yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
alfalfat0
Outcome
following year's yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
following yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but this did not affect the following year's yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑

EPTC · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.