Intervention effectmodel-written summary

With POST herbicides, flumioxazin and diclosulam did not differ in common lambsquarters control.

A claim from Economic Evaluation of Diclosulam and Flumioxazin Systems in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea1 · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With POST herbicides, flumioxazin and diclosulam did not differ in common lambsquarters control.

Treatment
flumioxazine0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
common lambsquarters controle0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
when POST herbicides were usede0
Comparator
diclosulam PREe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in common lambsquarters control between flumioxazin and diclosulam PRE when POST herbicides were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1172
e1

“peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1788

Title

Economic Evaluation of Diclosulam and Flumioxazin Systems in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea1

GEORGE H. SCOTT; SHAWN D. ASKEW; JOHN W. WILCUT Weed Technology 2001. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0360:eeodaf]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-3bfdb2455ea781d500bfe229e6d067c770f975b432b34342e3255e24489d047e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

flumioxazin · Chenopodium album · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.