Claim · model-written summary
Protected cultivation left acid contents similar.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Protected cultivatione1
- Outcome
- acid contents (citric, malic, and glutamic acids)e0
- Direction
- similare0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but similar acid contents (citric, malic, and glutamic acids)”
t0“Tomato”
e1“Protected cultivation tended to show lower sugar concentration (fructose and glucose)”
Title
Jaime Cebolla-Cornejo; Salvador Roselló; Mercedes Valcárcel; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2011. doi:10.1021/jf1045427
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation lowered fructose and glucose concentration.
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation decreased sucrose equivalents.
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation left sugar-to-acid ratios similar.
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation reduced organoleptic quality.
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation reduced pest and viral disease incidence.
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation doubled interaccession variability.
- Intervention effect Protected cultivation increased intra-accession variability.
- Association Genotype affected main aroma volatiles more than environment.
- Association Environment significantly affected hexanal and methyl salicylate.
- Association Genotype affected 10 of 12 main volatiles.
- Observation Genotype-dependent main aroma profiles could be identified across environments.
- Association Environment showed no significant effect on background volatiles.
- Association Genotype had a lower effect on background volatiles.
- Observation Genotypic trends could be identified in background notes.