Paper · 2019 · Horticulturae

Performance and Hydroponic Tomato Crop Quality Characteristics in a Novel Greenhouse Using Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Technology for Covering Material

Georgios K. Ntinas; Kalliopi Kadoglidou; Nektaria Tsivelika; et al.

12
claims
14
verbatim quotes
58
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated crop productivity and physiology during the hydroponic cultivation of medium-sized and cherry tomato crops, using two experimental greenhouses. Of the greenhouses, one used dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) technology for covering material, whilst the other, a conventional one (CONV), was covered using diffusion glass as a control. The effect of the colored lighting that resulted from the DSSC glass filtering on the physiological response of the crops was examined by measuring the plant transpiration rate and leaf chlorophyll content. Furthermore, we evaluated potential differences in the concentration of phytochemical compounds, such as ascorbic acid, lycopene, and quality characteristics. Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse. The DSSC greenhouse showed significantly higher values of bioactive compounds for both the cherry and medium-sized tomato, with increases in the ascorbic acid, lycopene, β-carotene, and total carotenoids concentration, which ranged from 6% to 26%. Finally, for both the hybrids, the 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) tests showed circa 10% and 5% increase, respectively, in the DSSC greenhouse.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC lowered early tomato yield.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
earlye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONV greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC lowered total tomato yield.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
total yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONV greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC lowered chlorophyll content.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONV greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC lowered stomatal conductance.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONV greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC lowered photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONV greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC lowered transpiration rate.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONV greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants in the DSSC greenhouse presented lower early and total yields, as well as lower chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate values, especially in the medium-sized fruits, as compared to the CONV greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC increased ascorbic acid concentration by a reported range of 6% to 26%.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6% to 26%e0
Qualifier
both the cherry and medium-sized tomatoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DSSC greenhouse showed significantly higher values of bioactive compounds for both the cherry and medium-sized tomato, with increases in the ascorbic acid, lycopene, β-carotene, and total carotenoids concentration, which ranged from 6% to 26%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC increased lycopene concentration within the reported 6% to 26% range.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6% to 26%e0
Qualifier
both the cherry and medium-sized tomatoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DSSC greenhouse showed significantly higher values of bioactive compounds for both the cherry and medium-sized tomato, with increases in the ascorbic acid, lycopene, β-carotene, and total carotenoids concentration, which ranged from 6% to 26%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC increased beta-carotene concentration within the reported 6% to 26% range.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
β-carotenee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6% to 26%e0
Qualifier
both the cherry and medium-sized tomatoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DSSC greenhouse showed significantly higher values of bioactive compounds for both the cherry and medium-sized tomato, with increases in the ascorbic acid, lycopene, β-carotene, and total carotenoids concentration, which ranged from 6% to 26%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DSSC increased total carotenoid concentration within the reported 6% to 26% range.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
total carotenoids concentratione0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6% to 26%e0
Qualifier
both the cherry and medium-sized tomatoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DSSC greenhouse showed significantly higher values of bioactive compounds for both the cherry and medium-sized tomato, with increases in the ascorbic acid, lycopene, β-carotene, and total carotenoids concentration, which ranged from 6% to 26%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABTS test values increased by circa 10% in the DSSC greenhouse.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
(ABTS)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
circa 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finally, for both the hybrids, the 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) tests showed circa 10% and 5% increase, respectively, in the DSSC greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH test values increased by circa 5% in the DSSC greenhouse.

Treatment
DSSC greenhousee0
Outcome
(DPPH)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finally, for both the hybrids, the 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) tests showed circa 10% and 5% increase, respectively, in the DSSC greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cultivation system · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 78 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.