Paper · 2009 · Environment Control in Biology

Speaking Plant/Fruit Approach for Greenhouses and Plant Factories

Tetsuo MORIMOTO; Yasushi HASHIMOTO

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant control systems are usually characterized by complexity and uncertainty. A skilled grower can deal well with various plants and yield good products using intuition and visual information, communicating with the plants. To realize such tasks scientifically, it is important to measure physiological responses of the plant using sensors and then use that information for environmental control for optimization. Such an approach is called the ‘speaking plant approach (SPA)’. This approach is also easy to apply storage processes. Such an application could be a ‘speaking fruit approach (SFA)’. Measurement, identification and optimization of plant responses (or fruit responses), as affected by environmental factors, are important tasks for the SPA (or SFA). It is, however, difficult to sufficiently address these tasks because plant responses are quite complex and uncertain, but intelligent control techniques can facilitate such tasks. This paper presents the concepts of SPA and SFA, an intelligent control technique for realizing the SPA (or SFA), and their applications for optimizing cultivation and storage processes, aimed at qualitative improvement of plants and fruits. In the cultivation process, the net photosynthetic rate of a tomato was maximized by the drainage and supply operation of a hydroponic solution and tomato growth during the seedling stage was optimized by nutrient concentration of a hydroponic solution. For the storage process, the rate of water loss in tomatoes was minimized by temperature. The optimal value of each environmental factor was not assigned a constant value but rather an optimal combination of maximum and minimum values. These results suggest that the optimal application of environmental stress to the plant allows for qualitative improvement of plants and fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroponic drainage and supply operation maximized tomato net photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
drainage and supply operation of a hydroponic solutione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the net photosynthetic rate of a tomato was maximized by the drainage and supply operation of a hydroponic solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroponic nutrient concentration optimized tomato seedling growth.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
nutrient concentration of a hydroponic solutione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
optimizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato growth during the seedling stage was optimized by nutrient concentration of a hydroponic solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature minimized the rate of water loss in stored tomatoes.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
rate of water losse0
Direction
minimizede0
Qualifier
storage processe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the storage process, the rate of water loss in tomatoes was minimized by temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal environmental factor setting combined maximum and minimum values.

Outcome
optimal combination of maximum and minimum valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal value of each environmental factor was not assigned a constant value but rather an optimal combination of maximum and minimum values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1675 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato growth during the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1374 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.