Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Last irrigation at late milk stage gave significantly the highest wheat grain yield, 5.3 t/ha.

A claim from Effect of Last Irrigation Scheduling and Foliar Spray of Bio Regulators on the Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) In Context to the Changing on Climate under South East Rajasthan, India · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Last irrigation at late milk stage gave significantly the highest wheat grain yield, 5.3 t/ha.

Treatment
last irrigation at late milk stagee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.3 t/hae1
Comparator
early milk, late soft dough stage and controle1
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Kotae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive years from 2014-15 and 2015-16 at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125
e1

“Pooled data shows that under last irrigation at late milk stage was recorded significantly the highest grain yield (5.3 t/ha) and straw yield (7.0 t/ha) as compare to early milk, late soft dough stage and control but at par with early soft dough stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–945
t0

“Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–123

Title

Effect of Last Irrigation Scheduling and Foliar Spray of Bio Regulators on the Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) In Context to the Changing on Climate under South East Rajasthan, India

Harphool Meena; R.S. Narolia; Pratap Singh; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.199

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3c722a6b1f7a41767208f2417bebb0130ae8e466ee4f57814f218df2b162767b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.