Claim · model-written summary
System II decreased iron utilization efficiency by 24.09%.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the iron utilization efficiency decreased 23.26% and 24.09%”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Title
Zuo Yuan ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2003
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect System I increased peanut iron uptake efficiency by 68.72% versus monocropping.
- Intervention effect System II increased peanut iron uptake efficiency by 97.68% versus monocropping.
- Intervention effect System I decreased iron utilization efficiency by 23.26%.
- Observation System I land equivalent ratio was 1.18.
- Observation System II land equivalent ratio was 1.27.
- Mechanism Iron uptake efficiency was the main source of intercropping advantage.
- Mechanism Iron utilization efficiency did not contribute to intercropping advantage.
- Mechanism Reciprocation between uptake and utilization efficiency contributed little to advantage.