Abstract
The field experiment was carried out to study the effect of peanut intercropped with maize in different two intercropping systems on iron uptake and utilization efficiency of peanut. In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively, but for the iron utilization efficiency decreased 23.26% and 24.09%. The land equivalent ratio of intercropping Ⅰand intercropping Ⅱ were 1.18 and 1.27, respectively (LER1). It also indicated that improving iron nutrition of peanut intercropped with maize showed remarkable intercropping advantage. The intercropping advantage of peanut and maize was mainly from iron uptake efficiency of crops, but the iron utilization of crops had no contribution to intercropping advantage. The reciprocation of iron uptake and utilization efficiency of crops also had little contribution to intercropping advantage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
System I increased peanut iron uptake efficiency by 68.72% versus monocropping.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
System II increased peanut iron uptake efficiency by 97.68% versus monocropping.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
System I decreased iron utilization efficiency by 23.26%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the iron utilization efficiency decreased 23.26% and 24.09%”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
System II decreased iron utilization efficiency by 24.09%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the iron utilization efficiency decreased 23.26% and 24.09%”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
System I land equivalent ratio was 1.18.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The land equivalent ratio of intercropping Ⅰand intercropping Ⅱ were 1.18 and 1.27, respectively”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
System II land equivalent ratio was 1.27.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The land equivalent ratio of intercropping Ⅰand intercropping Ⅱ were 1.18 and 1.27, respectively”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron uptake efficiency was the main source of intercropping advantage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping advantage of peanut and maize was mainly from iron uptake efficiency of crops”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron utilization efficiency did not contribute to intercropping advantage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the iron utilization of crops had no contribution to intercropping advantage”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Reciprocation between uptake and utilization efficiency contributed little to advantage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reciprocation of iron uptake and utilization efficiency of crops also had little contribution to intercropping advantage”
e1“In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively”