Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Enterobacter cloaca inoculum gave higher plant height, shoot dry weight and pod yield than Rhizobium sp., Bacillus cereus and Enterobacter ludwigii treatments.

A claim from Evaluation of Biofertilizers Prepared from Local Bacterial Isolates in the Growth and Yield of Cowpea in Gypsiferous Soil · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter cloaca inoculum gave higher plant height, shoot dry weight and pod yield than Rhizobium sp., Bacillus cereus and Enterobacter ludwigii treatments.

Treatment
inoculum prepared from Enterobacter cloaca bacteriae3
Interactor
Enterobacter cloacae3symbiont
Outcome
plant height, shoot dry weight and pod yielde3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
Rhizobium sp, Bacillus cereus, Enterobacter ludwigiie3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101
e3

“the treatment inoculated with the inoculum prepared from Enterobacter cloaca bacteria was superior to Rhizobium sp, Bacillus cereus, Enterobacter ludwigii treatments in plant height, shoot dry weight and pod yield of cowpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1662

Title

Evaluation of Biofertilizers Prepared from Local Bacterial Isolates in the Growth and Yield of Cowpea in Gypsiferous Soil

F K Abd; A E S Alkurtany IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1252/1/012072

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-3dab27c06cd85aa1676eb4909cdb8556db2668e3e3be511ba18af33bf8509d87 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Virus-inoculated cowpea had significantly lower growth and yield than buffer controls.

    Interactions of viruses in Cowpea: effects on growth and yield parameters. · 2007 · compared with buffer inoculated control plants

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Time of CPSMV inoculation had the most profound impact on cowpea yield.

    Effect ofCowpea severe mosaic viruson Crop Growth Characteristics and Yield of Cowpea · 2005

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Inoculation of cowpea with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alone gave no significant increase in shoot biomass or yield, whatever the soil type.

    Response of Cowpea to Symbiotic Microorganisms Inoculation (Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobium) in Cultivated Soils in Senegal · 2015

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Inoculation with two effective local rhizobial strains gave no significant yield difference over uninoculated and N-fed cowpea

    Response of cowpea Vigna unguiculata L Walp to nitrogen and inoculation in Trinidad · 1984 · compared with uninoculated and N-fed treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Bradyrhizobium inoculation had no significant effect on cowpea grain yield.

    Influence of Bradyrhizobium Inoculation and Fungicide Seed Treatment on Development and Yield of Cowpea, Lablab, and Soybean · 2017 · compared with a control

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Biofertilizer plus biochar produced about 2% fewer pods than SSP.

    EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA (PGPR) AND BIOCHAR ON SOIL PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE OF COWPEA (Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp) · 2018 · compared with SSP

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Grain yield did not differ among seven rhizobia inoculations, mineral nitrogen fertilization and controls.

    Strategies for Improving Cowpea Grain Yield in the Eastern Amazon: Biological Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus Nutrition, and Molybdenum Seed Enrichment · 2023 · compared with the control (without inoculation and N fertilization)

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Artificial inoculation reduced cowpea yield by 25.29 to 53.50 per cent versus natural inoculation.

    Effect of Sowing Time and Plant Population on Bacterial Blight and Yield of Cowpea · 1989 · compared with natural

    Opposite direction

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.