Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nanoparticle forms had greater nematicidal effects than normal extract forms.

A claim from Effectiveness of nanoparticles of some plant extracts against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants. · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle forms had greater nematicidal effects than normal extract forms.

Treatment
nanoparticles formse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
normal extracts formse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoparticles forms of all tested compounds consistently showed higher effect than normal extracts forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–653
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–121

Title

Effectiveness of nanoparticles of some plant extracts against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.

Deiaa El-Habashy SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2022. doi:10.21608/svuijas.2022.143524.1213

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3dec889ba2b140b7e9fafedcd7dd38c0d4a35c7f07b60cd6db77627f9c64da80 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.