Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend NE dose for wheat and maize productivity and profitability.
- Taxon
- wheat and maize
Triticum aestivum
Zea mayse0 - Treatment
- NE dosee0
- Outcome
- better productivity and profitabilitye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NE dose was the best nutrient management practice for better productivity and profitability for the wheat and maize”
Title
PR Dulal; Santosh Marahatta; Shrawan Kumar Sah; et al. Agronomy Journal of Nepal 2021. doi:10.3126/ajn.v5i01.44836
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Wheat yield attributes and rice equivalent yield were not significantly influenced by tillage.
- Intervention effect Maize grains per cob were significantly higher under CT fa Pu-TPR.
- Intervention effect Maize yield was significantly higher by 8.9% under ZT fa CT-DDSR.
- Intervention effect NE management gave wheat 281.9 spikes per square metre.
- Intervention effect NE management gave wheat 44.5 grains per spike.
- Intervention effect NE management gave wheat higher straw yield of 5.9 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Maize performed better under NE assisted nutrient management.
- Intervention effect Maize had a 21% yield advantage following BM/GM practices.
- Intervention effect Maize had a 14% yield advantage following residue mulching.
- Intervention effect Wheat rice equivalent yield was 21% more under NE dose than 100% RDF.
- Intervention effect Wheat rice equivalent yield was 16% more under R+75% RDF fa BM/GM than 100% RDF.
- Intervention effect NE dose had the best wheat benefit-cost ratio, 1.9.
- Intervention effect NE dose had the best maize benefit-cost ratio, 3.0.