Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was significantly higher by 8.9% under ZT fa CT-DDSR.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher (8.9%) yield under ZT fa CT-DDSR”
t0“Maize”
Title
PR Dulal; Santosh Marahatta; Shrawan Kumar Sah; et al. Agronomy Journal of Nepal 2021. doi:10.3126/ajn.v5i01.44836
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Wheat yield attributes and rice equivalent yield were not significantly influenced by tillage.
- Intervention effect Maize grains per cob were significantly higher under CT fa Pu-TPR.
- Intervention effect NE management gave wheat 281.9 spikes per square metre.
- Intervention effect NE management gave wheat 44.5 grains per spike.
- Intervention effect NE management gave wheat higher straw yield of 5.9 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Maize performed better under NE assisted nutrient management.
- Intervention effect Maize had a 21% yield advantage following BM/GM practices.
- Intervention effect Maize had a 14% yield advantage following residue mulching.
- Intervention effect Wheat rice equivalent yield was 21% more under NE dose than 100% RDF.
- Intervention effect Wheat rice equivalent yield was 16% more under R+75% RDF fa BM/GM than 100% RDF.
- Intervention effect NE dose had the best wheat benefit-cost ratio, 1.9.
- Intervention effect NE dose had the best maize benefit-cost ratio, 3.0.
- Recommendation The authors recommend NE dose for wheat and maize productivity and profitability.