Intervention effectmodel-written summary

B, Mo and Zn fertilizer significantly increased alfalfa height.

A claim from Effects of Boron, Molybdenum and Zinc Fertilizer Application on the Yield of Alfalfa · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B, Mo and Zn fertilizer significantly increased alfalfa height.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
B, Mo and Zn fertilizere0
Outcome
heightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry matter (DM) yields and heights of alfalfa increased significantly (P<0. 05) with the application of B, Mo and Zn fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–307

Title

Effects of Boron, Molybdenum and Zinc Fertilizer Application on the Yield of Alfalfa

Liu Gui-he 2005

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-3f18d90bf0cb4d8487ab350edc5379eed59e9c615eba615e33a6d2417cb261e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

89 papers: 71 positive, 18 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.