Paper · 2002 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Influence of summer sowing dates, N fertilization and irrigation on autumn VSP accumulation and dynamics of spring regrowth in alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)

Eric Justes; Pascal Thiébeau; Jean‐Christophe Avice; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) depends on forage management or environmental conditions that change C and N resource acquisition, and endogenous plants factors such as root organic reserves and number of active meristems. The aim of this work is to study the influence of two sowing dates in summer (12 July or 9 August), N fertilization (0 or 100 kg ha −1 ) and/or irrigation applied during the first year of alfalfa establishment on (i) the accumulation of N organic reserves (soluble proteins and more specifically vegetative storage protein) in taproots during autumn, (ii) the number of crown axillary meristems present at the end of winter and (iii) the dynamics of spring shoot growth. Delaying the sowing date for one month reduced root growth and root N storage, especially vegetative storage proteins (VSP) during autumn. Irrespective of sowing dates, N fertilization did not affect root biomass, number of crown buds, total root N, root soluble protein or VSP concentrations. By contrast, water deficiency during alfalfa establishment in the early summer reduced both root growth and N reserve accumulation. When spring growth resumed, there is a significant linear relationship between leaf area development and soluble protein and VSP concentrations in taproots, and also the number of crown buds. The results showed that an early sowing date and adequate water status during the summer allowed alfalfa plants to accumulate N reserves by increasing taproot mass and soluble protein concentrations, especially VSPs. This resulted in rapid shoot regrowth rates the following spring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying sowing by one month reduced root growth and root N storage in alfalfa during autumn, especially VSP.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
Delaying the sowing date for one monthe1
Outcome
root growth and root N storagee1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
especially vegetative storage proteins (VSP) during autumne1
Comparator
12 Julye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delaying the sowing date for one month reduced root growth and root N storage, especially vegetative storage proteins (VSP) during autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“two sowing dates in summer (12 July or 9 August)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization did not affect root biomass, number of crown buds or total root N in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
roote3
Treatment
N fertilizatione3
Outcome
root biomass, number of crown buds, total root Ne3
Direction
did not affecte3
Qualifier
Irrespective of sowing datese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“Irrespective of sowing dates, N fertilization did not affect root biomass, number of crown buds, total root N, root soluble protein or VSP concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization did not affect root soluble protein or VSP concentrations in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
roote3
Treatment
N fertilizatione3
Outcome
root soluble protein or VSP concentrationse3
Direction
did not affecte3
Qualifier
Irrespective of sowing datese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“Irrespective of sowing dates, N fertilization did not affect root biomass, number of crown buds, total root N, root soluble protein or VSP concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency during establishment in early summer reduced root growth and N reserve accumulation in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae4
Organ / stage
roote4
Treatment
water deficiency during alfalfa establishment in the early summere4
Outcome
root growth and N reserve accumulatione4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“water deficiency during alfalfa establishment in the early summer reduced both root growth and N reserve accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble protein and VSP concentrations in alfalfa taproots show a significant linear relationship with leaf area development.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
taprootse5
Outcome
soluble protein and VSP concentrationse5
Qualifier
leaf area developmente5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“there is a significant linear relationship between leaf area development and soluble protein and VSP concentrations in taproots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of crown buds in alfalfa shows a significant linear relationship with leaf area development.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
number of crown budse6
Qualifier
leaf area developmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“there is a significant linear relationship between leaf area development and soluble protein and VSP concentrations in taproots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1290 · show in text ↑
e6

“and also the number of crown buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An early sowing date with adequate summer water status increased taproot mass and soluble protein concentrations in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfa plantsMedicago sativae7
Organ / stage
taproote7
Treatment
an early sowing date and adequate water status during the summere7
Outcome
taproot mass and soluble protein concentrationse7
Direction
increasinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The results showed that an early sowing date and adequate water status during the summer allowed alfalfa plants to accumulate N reserves by increasing taproot mass and soluble protein concentrations, especially VSPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing with adequate summer water status resulted in rapid shoot regrowth in spring in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfa plantsMedicago sativae7
Treatment
an early sowing date and adequate water status during the summere7
Outcome
shoot regrowth ratese6
Direction
rapide6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The results showed that an early sowing date and adequate water status during the summer allowed alfalfa plants to accumulate N reserves by increasing taproot mass and soluble protein concentrations, especially VSPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1542 · show in text ↑
e6

“This resulted in rapid shoot regrowth rates the following spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1608 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

72 papers: 20 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

fertilization · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

89 papers: 71 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sowing time · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.