Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Organic nitrogen reduced wild mustard maximal relative growth rate by 12% compared with early fertilizer in both years.

A claim from Nitrogen source influences wild mustard growth and competitive effect on sweet corn · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nitrogen reduced wild mustard maximal relative growth rate by 12% compared with early fertilizer in both years.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
organice0
Interactor
Wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
Wild mustard's maximal relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
1997 and 1998e0
Comparator
early treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Wild mustard's maximal relative growth rate (RGR) was 12% lower (P < 0.05) in 1997 and 1998, and the amount of time needed to achieve maximal RGR was delayed by 0.8 d (P < 0.05) in 1997 in the organic compared to the early treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–919
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83

Title

Nitrogen source influences wild mustard growth and competitive effect on sweet corn

Adam S. Davis; Matt Liebman Weed Science 2001. doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0558:nsiwmg]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-3faf35e0213d56d29045862854851ef59d72370756ae427a409b181b86c1eead · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 15 positive, 12 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.