Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lesions were larger at reduced light intensities.

A claim from Variation in Expression of Monogenic Resistance in Corn toExserohilum turcicumRace 3 Under Different Temperature and Light Regimes · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesions were larger at reduced light intensities.

Treatment
reduced light intensitiese0
Outcome
Lesionse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesions were also larger (P=0.05) at the reduced light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–553
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55

Title

Variation in Expression of Monogenic Resistance in Corn toExserohilum turcicumRace 3 Under Different Temperature and Light Regimes

S. Leath Phytopathology 1990. doi:10.1094/phyto-80-309

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-41eea47eadf5d5b7633a4c8d57469a7b803021981d60ad0f3bcc250585113a18 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

light · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.