Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under conservation tillage, straw mulch up to 4 cm gave the lowest weed infestation and dry mass of weeds in sugar beet.

A claim from Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under intensive and conservation soil tillage: I. Crop weediness · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under conservation tillage, straw mulch up to 4 cm gave the lowest weed infestation and dry mass of weeds in sugar beet.

Treatment
straw mulch (WSM) up to 4 cme3
Interactor
weedse3weed
Outcome
weed infestation and dry mass of weedse3
Direction
loweste3
Setting
conservation soil tillage conditionse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of non-chemical weed control under different soil tillage on sugar beet crop weediness was investigated at the Experimental Station of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture in a silty loam Luvisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–210
e3

“in conservation soil tillage conditions the lowest weed infestation and dry mass of weeds were observed in straw mulch (WSM) up to 4 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1359

Title

Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under intensive and conservation soil tillage: I. Crop weediness

Kęstutis Romaneckas; Regina Romaneckienė; Vytautas Pilipavičius Agronomy Research 2009

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-42521ac530f208fe11b0e671e469fd1421514d6a6f2a903d4b8ce92d1331c656 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

organic · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.