Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under intensive tillage, white mustard living mulch gave the highest choking of weeds in sugar beet.

A claim from Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under intensive and conservation soil tillage: I. Crop weediness · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under intensive tillage, white mustard living mulch gave the highest choking of weeds in sugar beet.

Treatment
white mustard (WMM) living mulchese1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
choking of weedse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in conditions of intensive soil tillagee1
Setting
Experimental Station of the Lithuanian University of Agriculturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of non-chemical weed control under different soil tillage on sugar beet crop weediness was investigated at the Experimental Station of the Lithuanian University of Agriculture in a silty loam Luvisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–210
e1

“in conditions of intensive soil tillage the highest choking of weeds was observed by annual ryegrass (ARM) and white mustard (WMM) living mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1066

Title

Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under intensive and conservation soil tillage: I. Crop weediness

Kęstutis Romaneckas; Regina Romaneckienė; Vytautas Pilipavičius Agronomy Research 2009

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ce22e2fa49ea06f742c248ccb3bb6227a9b8193d1b744c6ac09aea2ed1274c74 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Sinapis alba · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cover crop · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

mulching · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.