Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Production

INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.

R. Tagour; G. Abd El-Hamed; R. Mousa; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 winter seasons to evaluate the effect of some non-traditional methods for weed control which are being (mulching by rice straw and burning has been carried after ridging and directly before sowing) on growth, yield and juice quality as well as associated weeds of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) grown in salinity soil condition at El-Serw Research Station. The most important results obtained could be summarized as follows: - All weed control treatments reduced significantly fresh weight (g/m2) of broad-leaf, grassy and total weeds growth which associated with sugar beet plants, dry weight and total of sugar beet weeds as compared to the unweeded check. - Two hoeing with mulching was the most effective on controlling weeds (91.1-92.2%) followed by one hoeing with mulching (85.9-86.5%) and burning with two hoeing (82.8-84.2%), respectively. - Application of two hoeing improved drastically the efficiency of the mulching and burning in controlling sugar beet weeds when compared with other treatments. - The results show that two hoeing with mulching resulted in good control of total weeds after 120 days from sowing (DAS). - All growth criteria i.e., plant height (cm), leaves number/plant, root/top ratio and root characters responded significantly to two hoeing with mulching followed by one hoeing with mulching and burning with two hoeing , respectively, as compared with the untreated treatment. - Concerning the effect of weed control methods treatments on yield components of sugar beet plants, corresponding data cleared that two hoeing with mulching gave the highest values of tops, roots, biological and sugar yields. - Application of hoeing with mulching or burning caused significant increases in values of juice quality parameters i.e., sucrose and purity % as compared with the untreated treatment. - Generally, it can be concluded that application of two or one hoeing with mulching of rice straw and burning with two hoeing were the recommended treatments for obtaining the highest growth, yield and juice quality of sugar beet plants as well as significant reduction in total weeds under salinity lands condition at El-Serw. This study suggest that non traditional weed control by mulching or burning can be used in compatible manner with mechanical hoeing in integrated weed strategy in sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly reduced weed fresh and dry weight relative to an unweeded check.

Treatment
All weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
fresh weight (g/m2) of broad-leaf, grassy and total weeds growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All weed control treatments reduced significantly fresh weight (g/m2) of broad-leaf, grassy and total weeds growth which associated with sugar beet plants, dry weight and total of sugar beet weeds as compared to the unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings with mulching controlled 91.1-92.2% of weeds.

Treatment
Two hoeing with mulchinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
91.1-92.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two hoeing with mulching was the most effective on controlling weeds (91.1-92.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One hoeing with mulching controlled 85.9-86.5% of weeds.

Treatment
one hoeing with mulchinge0
Outcome
mulchinge0
Value
85.9-86.5%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“one hoeing with mulching (85.9-86.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning with two hoeings controlled 82.8-84.2% of weeds.

Treatment
burning with two hoeinge0
Outcome
burninge0
Value
82.8-84.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“burning with two hoeing (82.8-84.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings improved the weed control efficiency of mulching and burning.

Treatment
two hoeinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
efficiency of the mulching and burning in controlling sugar beet weedse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of two hoeing improved drastically the efficiency of the mulching and burning in controlling sugar beet weeds when compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings with mulching controlled total weeds after 120 days.

Treatment
two hoeing with mulchinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of total weedse0
Direction
goode0
Qualifier
after 120 days from sowing (DAS)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“two hoeing with mulching resulted in good control of total weeds after 120 days from sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings with mulching significantly improved sugar beet growth traits relative to untreated plants.

Treatment
two hoeing with mulchinge0
Outcome
plant height (cm), leaves number/plant, root/top ratioe0
Comparator
untreated treatmente0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (cm), leaves number/plant, root/top ratio and root characters responded significantly to two hoeing with mulching followed by one hoeing with mulching and burning with two hoeing , respectively, as compared with the untreated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings with mulching gave the highest tops, roots, biological and sugar yields.

Treatment
two hoeing with mulchinge0
Outcome
tops, roots, biological and sugar yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“two hoeing with mulching gave the highest values of tops, roots, biological and sugar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoeing with mulching or burning significantly increased juice sucrose and purity relative to untreated plants.

Treatment
hoeing with mulching or burninge0
Outcome
sucrose and purity %e0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
untreated treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“hoeing with mulching or burning caused significant increases in values of juice quality parameters i.e., sucrose and purity % as compared with the untreated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1891 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend hoeing with rice straw mulching or burning for sugar beet production and weed reduction in saline land.

Treatment
two or one hoeing with mulching of rice straw and burning with two hoeinge0
Outcome
recommended treatmentse0
Setting
El-Serwe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of two or one hoeing with mulching of rice straw and burning with two hoeing were the recommended treatments for obtaining the highest growth, yield and juice quality of sugar beet plants as well as significant reduction in total weeds under salinity lands condition at El-Serw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2220 · show in text ↑

mulching · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 50 positive, 13 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fire · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.