Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two hoeings with mulching significantly improved sugar beet growth traits relative to untreated plants.

A claim from INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS. · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings with mulching significantly improved sugar beet growth traits relative to untreated plants.

Treatment
two hoeing with mulchinge0
Outcome
plant height (cm), leaves number/plant, root/top ratioe0
Comparator
untreated treatmente0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (cm), leaves number/plant, root/top ratio and root characters responded significantly to two hoeing with mulching followed by one hoeing with mulching and burning with two hoeing , respectively, as compared with the untreated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1479

Title

INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS.

R. Tagour; G. Abd El-Hamed; R. Mousa; et al. Journal of Plant Production 2012. doi:10.21608/jpp.2012.84211

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b97bbb374b2aab4ece02f21aef757236595c556a4aadb3a3ba03b6db7005bc9e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

mulching · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.