Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inter-row cutting and mulching with white mustard gave the largest sugar beet leaf area index, although not significant.

A claim from The influence of non-chemical weed control methods on sugar beet productivity and quality parameters · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-row cutting and mulching with white mustard gave the largest sugar beet leaf area index, although not significant.

Treatment
inter-row cutting out and mulching with white mustarde7
Outcome
index of sugar beet leaf areae7
Direction
largeste7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet productivity and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–100
e7

“Although insignificant, but the largest index of sugar beet leaf area was found in the experimental plots, where inter-row cutting out and mulching with white mustard were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1183

Title

The influence of non-chemical weed control methods on sugar beet productivity and quality parameters

Jovita Balandaitė; Aida Adamavičienė; Kęstutis Romaneckas; et al. Žemės ūkio mokslai 2019. doi:10.6001/zemesukiomokslai.v26i1.3964

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-36b913ce894df609d10ce298de27895568cbb1666a4b6ac67b930067e66c8091 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pruning · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Later thinning decreased all studied characters other than root diameter.

    INFLUENCE OF PLOUGHING DEPTH, PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER LEVEL AND THINNING DATE ON SUGAR BEET PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY · 2014 · compared with 20

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Plots hoed only during thinning had the lowest root length, circumference and diameter.

    Wpływ częstości wykonywania mechanicznych zabiegów pielęgnacyjnych oraz poziomu agrotechniki na cechy biometryczne korzeni buraka cukrowego · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Postponing cutting of weeds decreased their dry weight at harvest.

    Sugarbeet yield response to competition from Sinapis arvensis or Lolium perenne growing at three different distances from the beet and removed at various times during early growth · 2002

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Frequent cutting of bolting inflorescences improved root growth in bolters and non-bolters.

    Sowing sugar beet in autumn in England · 1975

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Leaf removal increased the relative growth rate of leaf blades.

    Recovery from Partial Defoliation and Root Pruning in Sugar Beet1 · 1971

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Decapitation and removal of unfolding leaves increased growth of remaining sugar-beet leaves, especially at less advanced stages.

    Developmental Physiology of Sugar-beet · 1972

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Average leaf length reached 32.0cm.

    Comparison of the Combined Effect of Intra Row Spacing and Harvesting Interval on Yield and Yield Components of Swiss Chard (Beta vulgaris L.) · 2019

    Same direction

See all 8 papers →

mulching · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Reflected light from differently coloured plastic mulches did not affect B. vulgaris growth.

    Shade avoidance cues reduceBeta vulgarisgrowth · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Mulch reduced bristly foxtail emergence relative to mulch-free plots by 0 to 34%.

    Allelopathic Potential of Winter Cereal Cover Crop Mulches on Grass Weed Suppression and Sugarbeet Development · 2006 · compared with mulch‐free plots

    Same direction

  3. positive
    All mulch treatments enhanced early sugar beet growth in 2015.

    Weed suppression and early sugar beet development under different cover crop mulches · 2017

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Vegetal mulch mitigated saline irrigation effects on beet plant height, leaf area and stem diameter.

    Growth and yield of beet irrigated with saline water in different types of vegetable mulching · 2021

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Black polyethylene mulch significantly improved sugar beet germination and growth relative to no mulch.

    Assessment of sugar beet agricultural practices for sustainable production under semi-arid environments · 2025 · compared with no mulch

    Same direction

  6. positive
    During one dry growing season, sugar beet emergence was enhanced by a cover crop mulch layer compared with uncovered soil.

    Integrated weed control in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), using precision farming technologies and cover cropping · 2017 · compared with uncovered soil

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Two hoeings with mulching significantly improved sugar beet growth traits relative to untreated plants.

    INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF MULCHING AND BURNING WITH HOEING ON SUGAR BEET AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS. · 2012 · compared with untreated treatment

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Double film increased germination potential 58.34% versus no film.

    Effects of Different Film Mulching Methods on Related Characters of Sugarbeet · 2014 · compared with non-film mulching

    Same direction

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.