Claim · model-written summary
The ethofumesate and diclofop preplant mixture followed by desmedipham and phenmedipham was the most effective weed control treatment.
- Taxon
- sugarbeets
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- a preplanting mixture of 2.2 kg/ha of ethofumesatee0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- control of weedse0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effective sequential treatment for control of weeds was a preplanting mixture of 2.2 kg/ha of ethofumesate [(±)-2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate] plus 1.7 kg/ha of diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} followed by a postemergence mixture of 0,6 kg/ha each of desmedipham [ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate (ester)] plus phenmedipham (methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate)”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Title
Herbicides Applied Sequentially for Economical Control of Annual Weeds in Sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris)
E. E. Schweizer Weed Science 1980. doi:10.1017/s0043174500055016
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Seven sequential treatments left fewer than 10 annual broadleaf weeds per 30 m of row, versus 40 under cycloate.
- Intervention effect Four sequential treatments significantly raised root yield over cycloate.
- Intervention effect Four sequential treatments significantly raised net returns over cycloate.
- Intervention effect Depending on treatment and year, tonnage rose 7.3 to 20.3 t/ha over cycloate.
- Intervention effect Depending on treatment and year, net returns rose $150 to $515/ha over cycloate.
- Intervention effect This sequence increased root yield by an average 20.3 t/ha over cycloate.
- Intervention effect This sequence increased net returns by $515/ha over cycloate.