Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Apparent B recovery and agronomic efficiency of B suggested that foliar application was more effective than soil application in tomato.

A claim from Screening Tomato Genotypes for B–Recovery and Acquisition Potential in Calcareous Soils · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent B recovery and agronomic efficiency of B suggested that foliar application was more effective than soil application in tomato.

Treatment
foliar applicatione1
Outcome
apparent B recovery (ABR) and agronomic efficiency (AE) of Be1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
soil applicatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty genotypes of tomato were studied under different doses of B-application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–174
e1

“The apparent B recovery (ABR) and agronomic efficiency (AE) of B suggested that foliar application was more effective in comparison to soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1228

Title

Screening Tomato Genotypes for B–Recovery and Acquisition Potential in Calcareous Soils

Bholanath Saha; Rajeev Padbhushan; Anupam Das; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2024. doi:10.1080/00103624.2024.2415926

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4459d0d7fdedccfb55332e70aca93a6651653cf877f75ed9e9c10cca4a52eb17 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.