Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Theerthampalayam village, Cuddalore distict on saline soil to study the Response of tomato to iron nutrition in saline soil. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design and replicated three times. The treatments were T1- RDF + Water spray (Control), T2- RDF + Soil application FeSO4 10 kg ha-1,T3- RDF+ Soil application FeSO4 20 kg ha-1, T4- RDF + Soil application FeSO4 30 kg ha-1, T5- RDF +Foliar spray 0.25 % (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT),T6- RDF + Foliar pray 0.50 % (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT), T7- RDF +Foliar spray 1.0 % (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT),T8- T2 + Foliar spray 0.25% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT), T9- T3+ Foliar spray 0.25% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT) T10- T4 + Foliar spray 0.25% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT) T11- T2 + Foliar spray 0.50 % (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT), T12- T3 + Foliar spray 0.50% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT), T13-T4 + Foliar spray 0.50 % (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT) T14- T2 + Foliar spray 1.0% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT), T15 – T3 + Foliar spray 1.0% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT) and T16- T4 + Foliar spray 1.0% (FeSO4 45 & 60 DAT).The results revealed that application of either soil or foliar or combined application of iron significantly influenced the tomato yield, iron uptake and iron use efficiency over control. The tomato yield was higher in combined application of soil and foliar iron compared to their individual applications. The highest tomato yield (365.50 q ha-1 ) and iron uptake (fruit 1112.65 and stover 897.15 g ha-1 ) was noticed T12 Combined application of soil and foliar iron recorded higher agronomic efficiency and apparent iron recovery compared to their individual applications which explained the highest yield in the best treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Iron application by soil, foliage, or both significantly influenced tomato yield over control.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- application of either soil or foliar or combined application of irone0
- Outcome
- tomato yielde0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of either soil or foliar or combined application of iron significantly influenced the tomato yield, iron uptake and iron use efficiency over control”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron application significantly influenced tomato iron uptake over control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- application of either soil or foliar or combined application of irone0
- Outcome
- iron uptakee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of either soil or foliar or combined application of iron significantly influenced the tomato yield, iron uptake and iron use efficiency over control”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron application significantly influenced tomato iron use efficiency over control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- application of either soil or foliar or combined application of irone0
- Outcome
- iron use efficiencye0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of either soil or foliar or combined application of iron significantly influenced the tomato yield, iron uptake and iron use efficiency over control”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and foliar iron application yielded more tomato than either application alone.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- combined application of soil and foliar irone0
- Outcome
- tomato yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- their individual applicationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tomato yield was higher in combined application of soil and foliar iron compared to their individual applications”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 produced the highest tomato yield of 365.50 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- T12e0
- Outcome
- tomato yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 365.50 q ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest tomato yield (365.50 q ha-1 ) and iron uptake (fruit 1112.65 and stover 897.15 g ha-1 ) was noticed T12”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had fruit iron uptake of 1112.65 g ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- fruite0
- Treatment
- T12e0
- Outcome
- iron uptakee0
- Value
- 1112.65e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“iron uptake (fruit 1112.65 and stover 897.15 g ha-1 ) was noticed T12”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had stover iron uptake of 897.15 g ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- stovere0
- Treatment
- T12e0
- Outcome
- iron uptakee0
- Value
- 897.15 g ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“iron uptake (fruit 1112.65 and stover 897.15 g ha-1 ) was noticed T12”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and foliar iron application had higher agronomic efficiency than individual applications.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Combined application of soil and foliar irone0
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- their individual applicationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined application of soil and foliar iron recorded higher agronomic efficiency and apparent iron recovery compared to their individual applications”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and foliar iron application had higher apparent iron recovery than individual applications.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Combined application of soil and foliar irone0
- Outcome
- apparent iron recoverye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- their individual applicationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined application of soil and foliar iron recorded higher agronomic efficiency and apparent iron recovery compared to their individual applications”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →iron atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →application · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →application · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
292 papers more in this group
See all 296 papers →application · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.