Paper · 2008 · HortScience

Remediation of Iron Chlorosis by the Addition of Fe-o,o-EDDHA in the Nutrient Solution Applied to Soilless Culture

Miguel Urrestarazu; Juan E. Alvaro; Soraya Moreno; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the remediation of ferric chlorosis using by iron (Fe)- o,o -EDDHA in fertigation of soilless crops compared with Fe-EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid) and its effects on production. Two separate greenhouse experiments were conducted in slab or bag cultures using the tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Daniela) and green bean crops ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Maite) in Almería (southeast Spain). The crops were subjected to the following experimental setup: 1) At first phase, all plants were treated with a standard nutrient solution and Fe was supplied as Fe-EDTA. 2) No Fe was supplied in the nutrient solution to bean crops 46 days after transplanting. For tomato plants, this element was eliminated from the nutrient solution since 102 days after transplanting. In this phase, Fe-EDTA was supplied to the control plants (T1). This phase was ended when signs of ferric chlorosis appeared on the leaves. 3) The ferric chlorosis was remediated with either Fe-EDTA (T2) or Fe- o,o -EDDHA (T3). The T4 group did not receive any supplements. The total tomato and bean production was improved after the Fe deficiency had been corrected by either EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplements in the fertigation of these crops. The synthetic Fe o,o -EDDHA chelate alleviated Fe deficiency by increasing the amount of iron in the rhizosphere and its supply to the leaves and petioles. Consequently, the decrease in tomato and bean production resulting from ferric chlorosis could be prevented. As a conclusion, the remediation of ferric chlorosis through fertigation with Fe o,o -EDDHA is as effective as the use of traditional Fe-EDTA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Correcting iron deficiency with EDTA or Fe-o,o-EDDHA improved tomato production compared with the unsupplemented group.

Treatment
EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplementse1
Outcome
productione1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
T4 groupe2
Setting
Almería (southeast Spain)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in slab or bag cultures using the tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Daniela) and green bean crops ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Maite) in Almería (southeast Spain)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–449 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total tomato and bean production was improved after the Fe deficiency had been corrected by either EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplements in the fertigation of these crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1267 · show in text ↑
e2

“The T4 group did not receive any supplements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Correcting iron deficiency with EDTA or Fe-o,o-EDDHA improved green bean production compared with the unsupplemented group.

Taxon
green beane0
Treatment
EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplementse1
Outcome
productione1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
T4 groupe2
Setting
Almería (southeast Spain)e0

Verbatim

e0

“in slab or bag cultures using the tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Daniela) and green bean crops ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Maite) in Almería (southeast Spain)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–449 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total tomato and bean production was improved after the Fe deficiency had been corrected by either EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplements in the fertigation of these crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1267 · show in text ↑
e2

“The T4 group did not receive any supplements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1094 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fe o,o-EDDHA alleviated iron deficiency in tomato and bean by increasing rhizosphere iron and its supply to leaves and petioles.

Taxon
tomato and beane1
Compound
Fe o,o -EDDHAe3
Outcome
its supply to the leaves and petiolese3
Qualifier
increasing the amount of iron in the rhizospheree3

Verbatim

e1

“The total tomato and bean production was improved after the Fe deficiency had been corrected by either EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplements in the fertigation of these crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1267 · show in text ↑
e3

“The synthetic Fe o,o -EDDHA chelate alleviated Fe deficiency by increasing the amount of iron in the rhizosphere and its supply to the leaves and petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remediation of ferric chlorosis by fertigation with Fe o,o-EDDHA is as effective as traditional Fe-EDTA in tomato and bean.

Taxon
tomato and beane1
Treatment
fertigation with Fe o,o -EDDHAe4
Outcome
remediation of ferric chlorosise4
Direction
as effectivee4
Comparator
traditional Fe-EDTAe4

Verbatim

e1

“The total tomato and bean production was improved after the Fe deficiency had been corrected by either EDTA and Fe o,o -EDDHA supplements in the fertigation of these crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1267 · show in text ↑
e4

“As a conclusion, the remediation of ferric chlorosis through fertigation with Fe o,o -EDDHA is as effective as the use of traditional Fe-EDTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1675 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Plants subjected to iron starvation showed Fe-chlorosis in all cultivars.

    Differences in Response to Iron Deficiency Among Some Lines of Common Bean · 2003

    No difference from an alternativeAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Iron deficiency caused leaf chlorosis in tomato.

    IRON IS REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF ROOT FERRIC CHELATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY IN IRON-DEFICIENT TOMATO · 2001

    No difference from an alternativeAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 84 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.