Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Organically coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles increased tomato plant growth and yield.

A claim from Improved iron use efficiency in tomato using organically coated iron oxide nanoparticles as efficient bioavailable Fe sources · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organically coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles increased tomato plant growth and yield.

Treatment
organically coated Fe 3 O 4 NPse3
Outcome
plant growth and yielde3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improved iron use efficiency in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38
e3

“In addition, using organically coated Fe 3 O 4 NPs, especially Fe 3 O 4 @HA increased plant growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1330

Title

Improved iron use efficiency in tomato using organically coated iron oxide nanoparticles as efficient bioavailable Fe sources

Tahereh Raiesi-Ardali; Leila Maˈmani; Mostafa Chorom; et al. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 2022. doi:10.1186/s40538-022-00318-y

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4e857cceee6dc9694642147c1a41add37947738441ce6b890b19dd364bbba8af · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.