Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spacing of 50 x 60 cm gave significantly maximum growth in height, number of leaves and stem diameter.

A claim from EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SPACING AND TRANSPLANTING DATES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF CAULIFLOWER (BRASSICAE OLERACEA VAR. BOTRYTIS L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 50 x 60 cm gave significantly maximum growth in height, number of leaves and stem diameter.

Treatment
spacing 50 x 60 cme2
Outcome
growth for height, number of leaves, stem diametere2
Direction
maximume2
Setting
experimental farm, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, DAV University, Jalandhare7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–143
e2

“while spacing 50 x 60 cm showed significantly maximum growth for height, number of leaves, stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–754
e7

“experimental farm, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, DAV University, Jalandhar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–245

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SPACING AND TRANSPLANTING DATES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF CAULIFLOWER (BRASSICAE OLERACEA VAR. BOTRYTIS L.)

Pooja Devi, Ashutosh Sharma Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7205893

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-44ba2218a75a1fd01b39aa54513e5020d64d2f461ae08e52973abcd24cf287a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

density · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.