Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethephon did not affect Jerseydawn fruit production in 1988.

A claim from Harvest Date and Size Distribution of Peach Fruit Are Altered with Fall-applied Ethephon · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not affect Jerseydawn fruit production in 1988.

Material
Jersey-dawne0
Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
Total fruit production per treee0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
1988e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit production per tree for `Jersey-dawn' was not affected by ethephon treatment in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–547
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49

Title

Harvest Date and Size Distribution of Peach Fruit Are Altered with Fall-applied Ethephon

Edward F. Durner; Thomas J. Gianfagna; Francis X. Rooney; et al. HortScience 1990. doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.8.911

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-451ca4c68a5da7d4bca6688ffb3b2fcc3c98a75bc02fbc825f96d8248ec1807b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.