Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 125% RDF level significantly affected energy input, output, net energy and energy intensity relative to other fertility levels.

A claim from Assessing the impact of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] genotypes under varied fertilization rates: A comprehensive analysis of energy dynamics · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% RDF level significantly affected energy input, output, net energy and energy intensity relative to other fertility levels.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
energy input, energy output, net energy and energy intensitye0
Comparator
other fertility levelse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125% RDF recorded significant response to energy input, energy output, net energy and energy intensity of pigeonpea compared to other fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1026

Title

Assessing the impact of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] genotypes under varied fertilization rates: A comprehensive analysis of energy dynamics

Kamalkant Yadav; DK Shukla; Jitendra Marskole; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i3a.377

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-4533ae8ffbd613550c2526679b6c6d0e4afe0a862df110e18b85ae64cd2f6f5e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

    Comparison of N2 Fixation and Yields in Cajanus cajan between Hydrogenase-Positive and Hydrogenase-Negative Rhizobia by In Situ Acetylene Reduction Assays and Direct 15N Partitioning · 1983

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Vermicompost and phosphocompost gave identical growth and yield outcomes.

    Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties to organic manures and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil · 2006 · compared with phosphoeompost

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments had no effect on green pod yield.

    Influence of Fertility Level on the Protein Content and Agronomic Characters of Pigeonpeas in an Oxisol · 1971

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

    Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Growth regulators and foliar fertilizer had no effect on pod set or final pod number.

    Influence of Nutrition and Bioregulators on Flower Retention, Pod Set and Yield on Pigeon Peas (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Huth) · 1981

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Organic fertilizer had no effect on Cajanus cajan productivity compared with the control

    Effect of Cow Dung as Organic Manure on the Productivity of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp (Pigeon pea) · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Increasing fertilizer did not significantly increase equivalent yield in pigeonpea plus urdbean.

    Production Potential and Economic Feasibility of Planting Pattern and Nutrient Management in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Based Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fertilizer improved pigeon pea yields by 32–449% compared with unfertilized intercrops.

    Sustainable Intensification with Cereal-Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa · 2019 · compared with unfertilized intercrops

    Same direction

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.