Claim · model-written summary
Q2 water with F3 amendment yielded 4.321 kg plant−1, highest versus Q1 with F1.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- water quality treatment Q2, combined with soil amendment F3e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.321e0
- Qualifier
- 3.993 kg plant−1e0
- Comparator
- fresh water treatment Q1 combined with a control treatment (F1)e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The water quality treatment Q2, combined with soil amendment F3, achieved the highest yield compared to the fresh water treatment Q1 combined with a control treatment (F1), reaching 4.321 and 3.993 kg plant−1, respectively”
t0“Tomato”
Title
Hussein R. Nayyef; Mohammed A. Naser; Flaieh Hammed Kassar; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15050734
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Association Irrigation water quality and amendments significantly affected studied properties.
- Association Study year affected water conductivity and weighted diameter, but not overall characteristics.
- Intervention effect Fresh water raised water use efficiency to 20.7 kg ha−1 mm−1.
- Intervention effect High organic matter raised water use efficiency to 21.13 kg ha−1 mm−1.
- Intervention effect Saline drainage water with amendments conserved 50% fresh water without a significant yield decrease.
- Recommendation The authors propose partially replacing low-salinity water with medium-conductivity saline water plus organic amendments.