Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chelate replacement caused no significant yield loss.

A claim from Use of Humic Substances and Amino Acids to Enhance Iron Availability for Tomato Plants from Applications of the Chelate FeEDDHA · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelate replacement caused no significant yield loss.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment
substituted by the humic compounde0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
without any significant lossese1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“part of the chelate was progressively substituted by the humic compound”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–741
e1

“without any significant losses of yield or fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–885
e2

“tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) cv Daniela”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–294

Title

Use of Humic Substances and Amino Acids to Enhance Iron Availability for Tomato Plants from Applications of the Chelate FeEDDHA

Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Margarita Juárez; Juan Sánchez-Andreu; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2005. doi:10.1080/01904160500306359

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e2fe3ec1b3d8dfa6d6cfa44d38a984d2cdb1cb8bd6be4d02e5ada52814c271cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

130 papers: 117 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 117 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.